PFC measurement at origin and boards
Inspection Testing · Lesson 27 · Advanced
Purpose
Determine prospective fault current at origins and distribution points using safe measurement, calculation or reliable enquiry.
Learning objectives
- Use the current required method
- Separate field verification from type testing
- Prove polarity through the complete path
- Compare fault current with every affected rating
Prospective short-circuit current (line-neutral/line-line) and prospective earth-fault current can differ. The governing prospective fault current at a point is the greater credible value for equipment rating checks.
Core theory
At the origin determine supply configuration and sources. Use a suitable instrument/method, calculation from loop impedance/voltage, or reliable DNO/manufacturer data; declare the method.
For three-phase systems evaluate line-line and line-earth conditions as applicable. Downstream fault current generally reduces with added impedance but local transformers, generators, motors or storage can contribute.
Measurement may expose high fault energy and instrument limitations. Do not open covers or probe busbars when a safer valid method exists; verify leads, CAT rating, access barriers and PPE/risk controls.
| Term | Meaning | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSCC | Prospective short-circuit current | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| PEFC | Prospective earth-fault current | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| PFC | Governing prospective fault current at a point | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Ipf ≈ U/ZloopScreening relationship; use the correct voltage and loop for the fault type and source model.
amperesAssumptions: Supplied readings and criteria are fictional evidence; Current edition and exact equipment data remain governing.
- Compare: 5.6 kA exceeds 3.9 kA.
- Record: Governing PFC at that point is 5.6 kA.
- Continue: Compare every affected device/assembly rating and backup combination.
Governing supplied PFC is 5.6 kA.
Reasonableness check: The decision distinguishes the measured quantity, protective function and equipment rating instead of treating one tester result as a complete certificate.
- Applying obsolete half-rated/5× rules as universal requirements
- Selecting an RCD type from trip time alone
- Checking PFC only against the final-circuit breaker
Where this appears in practice
RCD, polarity and PFC verification confirms correct conductor/device operation and that installed equipment can safely interrupt credible faults.
Knowledge check
Is earth-fault current always the highest prospective fault current?
No. Compare credible short-circuit and earth-fault values.
Answer: No. Compare credible short-circuit and earth-fault values.
Practical exercise
Calculate/compare PFC through an origin, sub-board and local generator contribution using supplied source impedances.
Summary
- Current field RCD testing is intentionally simplified
- Polarity requires both topology and final confirmation
- PFC is a worst-case rating and coordination check
Sources and review
- Changes to RCD testing in BS 7671:2018+A2:2022: IET Wiring Matters; 2022; confirm A4:2026/GN3 status; United Kingdom
- BS 7671 and Guidance Note 3: Inspection & Testing: IET; BS 7671:2018+A4:2026 / GN3 10th edition; transition rules apply; United Kingdom
- Minimizing unnecessary live testing for initial verification: IET Wiring Matters; 2025; United Kingdom
- GS38: Electrical test equipment for low-voltage systems: HSE; Fourth edition; Great Britain
Editorial review date: 2026-08-22. Professional electrical review is pending.