Comparing Zs to Table 41.1 limits
Inspection Testing · Lesson 18 · Advanced
Purpose
Compare Zs with the exact protective-device disconnection requirement and applicable maximum measured value.
Learning objectives
- Select a safe valid method
- Protect connected equipment
- Interpret measured versus design values
- Diagnose without bypassing protective evidence
Zs limits depend on system voltage, earthing/protective measure, device type/rating/curve, required disconnection time and the standard edition. Table 41.1 is not a universal device lookup table.
Core theory
Determine required disconnection time and the current needed to operate the exact fuse, circuit-breaker or protective function. Use applicable BS 7671 table/curve or manufacturer data.
Relate Zs to U0/Ia and account for conductor temperature and the chosen measured-versus-tabulated method. Current guidance can publish maximum permissible measured EFLI values; do not improvise a blanket percentage.
Include instrument uncertainty and worst credible conditions. Record the source/edition. RCD additional/fault protection may change the ADS assessment but does not excuse an absent CPC or other requirements.
| Term | Meaning | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ia | Current causing operation within required disconnection time | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| U0 | Nominal line-to-earth voltage | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Maximum measured Zs | Field comparison value derived for declared conditions/method | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Zs,max = U0/IaCore ADS relationship; exact standard factors, voltage and device data apply.
ohmsAssumptions: Supplied values and device limits are fictional design evidence; Instrument uncertainty and current edition data remain to be checked.
- Divide: Zs,max=230/400=0.575 Ω.
- Compare: A measured 0.62 Ω exceeds this supplied design maximum.
- Act: Do not round into compliance; investigate and redesign/repair using exact current rules.
Supplied maximum is 0.575 Ω; 0.62 Ω fails that stated criterion.
Reasonableness check: The conclusion retains units, test boundary and protective-device context; one favorable reading cannot excuse an unsafe method.
- Testing connected electronics at an unsuitable DC voltage
- Treating parallel paths as the designed CPC
- Comparing a measured Zs with the wrong device curve or an unqualified tabulated value
Where this appears in practice
IR and loop verification provide complementary evidence: insulation limits unintended current paths while loop impedance supports automatic disconnection under faults.
Knowledge check
Is Table 41.1 the correct source for every fuse, breaker and RCD-protected circuit?
No. Use the applicable device table/curve, protective measure and current edition/method.
Answer: No. Use the applicable device table/curve, protective measure and current edition/method.
Practical exercise
Build a comparison sheet for several device curves, disconnection times and measured/corrected Zs values.
Summary
- Choose voltage and connections from actual equipment
- Loop boundaries must be explicit
- Compare results with exact current design evidence
Sources and review
- BS 7671 and Guidance Note 3: Inspection & Testing: IET; BS 7671:2018+A4:2026 / GN3 10th edition; transition rules apply; United Kingdom
- Guidance Note 3 errata and diverted-neutral safety note: IET; GN3 9th-edition errata; use current GN3 procedure; United Kingdom
- GS38: Electrical test equipment for low-voltage systems: HSE; Fourth edition; Great Britain
Editorial review date: 2026-08-22. Professional electrical review is pending.