External impedance Ze measurement
Inspection Testing · Lesson 16 · Advanced
Purpose
Establish external earth-fault loop impedance Ze without creating greater danger than the information gained.
Learning objectives
- Select a safe valid method
- Protect connected equipment
- Interpret measured versus design values
- Diagnose without bypassing protective evidence
Ze is the impedance of the fault loop external to the installation. It may be obtained from reliable distributor data or measured at the origin by a competent controlled method.
Core theory
A direct Ze measurement typically requires installation circuits isolated and parallel installation earth/bond paths managed so the external path is measured. This can expose shock and diverted-neutral current hazards.
Before disturbing a TN-C-S/PME earthing or bonding connection, assess diverted neutral currents and shared extraneous paths under current GN3 guidance. Do not disconnect a live protective path casually.
Record supply voltage, earthing arrangement, method/source and result. Ze is not a generic DNO maximum assumption and must not include R1+R2 when used in Zs=Ze+(R1+R2).
| Term | Meaning | Symbol | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ze | External earth-fault loop impedance | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| MET | Main earthing terminal | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Diverted neutral current | Neutral current flowing through shared earth/bond paths | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Zs ≈ Ze + (R1+R2)Useful design/verification relationship when values share compatible conditions and boundaries.
ohmsAssumptions: Supplied values and device limits are fictional design evidence; Instrument uncertainty and current edition data remain to be checked.
- Add: Zs≈0.24+0.51=0.75 Ω.
- Boundary: Ze excludes internal circuit path; R1+R2 supplies it.
- Verify: Compare using applicable temperature/method and device data.
Calculated illustrative Zs is 0.75 Ω.
Reasonableness check: The conclusion retains units, test boundary and protective-device context; one favorable reading cannot excuse an unsafe method.
- Testing connected electronics at an unsuitable DC voltage
- Treating parallel paths as the designed CPC
- Comparing a measured Zs with the wrong device curve or an unqualified tabulated value
Where this appears in practice
IR and loop verification provide complementary evidence: insulation limits unintended current paths while loop impedance supports automatic disconnection under faults.
Knowledge check
Should the main earthing conductor be disconnected live whenever a direct Ze reading is desired?
No. Use a justified controlled method or reliable declared data; assess diverted-current danger.
Answer: No. Use a justified controlled method or reliable declared data; assess diverted-current danger.
Practical exercise
Write a Ze method statement choosing between DNO data and direct measurement for TN-S, TN-C-S and TT examples.
Summary
- Choose voltage and connections from actual equipment
- Loop boundaries must be explicit
- Compare results with exact current design evidence
Sources and review
- BS 7671 and Guidance Note 3: Inspection & Testing: IET; BS 7671:2018+A4:2026 / GN3 10th edition; transition rules apply; United Kingdom
- Guidance Note 3 errata and diverted-neutral safety note: IET; GN3 9th-edition errata; use current GN3 procedure; United Kingdom
- GS38: Electrical test equipment for low-voltage systems: HSE; Fourth edition; Great Britain
Editorial review date: 2026-08-22. Professional electrical review is pending.